H1000 is on my wish list of powders as well. Possibly the IMR Enduron series will be effectively appreciated and I am able to shift to that for far better availability.

I would say you'd be greater off viewing if anyone can be ready to trade you some Varget for the H4831SC.

The obvious lead to can be a rough/ruff bore. No degree of copper fouling cutting down agents within the powder will almost certainly accurate this.

Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or regular) and great deal you happen to be working with even though. Very same burn off level does not imply it will behave "precisely" the identical. I have found around a hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp many H4831.

Newbie to reloading. This will be useful for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was capable to get my arms on a couple lbs . of h4831.

Apache Jct Great information, I have jars of both of those and always wondered if they may be reloaded with the exact same recipes ought to I run out of one or one other.

Hodgdon H4831SC (Shorter Reduce) extruded rifle propellant is really a prime option for large match hunters who use handloader rifles. Released in the 1950s, this propellant has become enhanced with shorter grain dimensions which allows improved powder movement plus much h4831 vs h4831sc more uniformity.

The SC or SSC specified powders Usually let for larger load density, so that you can typically get a tiny bit additional powder in the offered case when working with compressed loads. Utilization of a fall tube can even further boost this benefit.

WA I'd propose a slower burner that will give far better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly h4831sc when you're loading heavies lengthy.

You could have to make a number of extra posts to obtain cleared to try and do PM's. Once you get to that standing I would write-up within the categorized reloading part h4831 vs h4831sc to see if any person is near you for your trade. Simply click to expand...

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're totally distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 being substantially quicker as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Really don't take care of them as a similar powder, since they most unquestionably are not.

It's probable that no more dialogue is needed, in which scenario we suggest setting up a whole new thread. If nevertheless you are feeling your response is needed you can however do so.

Am i able to think that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the physical distinction but will it have an effect on the burn up or velocity? I believe not but I'm not 100% certain.

The container didn't contain the "Excessive" brand on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, and I wound up with A different pound of H4831SC, this one particular Together with the "Severe" emblem on it.